Posted by paulfromwloh on Wednesday,November 30th,2016
.. she thinks that there is no such thing as ” judicial activism . ” Well , well ..
.. all she has to do is look in the mirror . She is the archtype of the radical judicial activist ..
.. judicial activism is , by definition , the construct of laws and / or parts of THE US Constitution and its Amendments . Doing so takes them entirely out of the course of their original and accepted meaning …
.. It is also the process of , in effect , writing law from the bench . A judge ‘ s job and role in our system is to interpret the law . They are to do so within the constructs of the US Constition . They are to do so only within the US Constition , and not using other legal works , such as UN declarations …
.. [h/t — Newsmax.com]..
.. [link] to the blog news post …
.. there are other examples of judicial activism in D.C. . All she needs to do is to ” look down the hall ” at the U.S. Supreme Court . Ruth Bader Ginsburg is the quintecential judicial activist . One that is more recent is her fellow ObamaCrap appointee , Elena Kagan …
.. judicial activism is a cancer on the body politic and our legal system . It must be stopped , smashed , and then finally be crushed …
Posted in 2nd Amendment, constitutional opinion, legal theory, personal opinion | Tagged: chevron deference, Constitutional opinion, gross judicial activism, judicial activism, legal analysis, legal school, legal theory, original intent, strict construction | Leave a Comment »
Posted by paulfromwloh on Monday,March 21st,2016
.. he is a fine lawyer , a top graduate of Harvard Law School ..
.. he was an excellent prosecutor , leading the team that went after Timothy McVeigh and the Oklahoma City bombing case ..
.. he has been a decent judge and appeals court judge ..
.. but ..
.. [h/t — m.NationalReview.com]..
.. [link] to the blog post ..
.. he is a judicial activist . Yes , that is a serious problem ..
.. Yes , he is not as bad a nominee as POTUS could have chosen . There are radical nuts out there , ones such as Patricia Merritt and Goodwin Liu , that POTUS might have chosen . There is also good reason why POTUS did not choose them — they would not have had a whisp of a prayer of getting a hearing , much less getting confirmed to SCOTUS . So POTUS did not nominate them . He went with someone safer , like Garland ..
.. but Garland is still a judicial activist . A moderate , yes , but still a judicial activist by definition . POTUS has poisoned the federal bench enough with these radical activists . it will take months , if not years of impeachment trails and convictions to remove them all . So do allow this guy on the court ..
Posted in judgement (moral), judicial activism, legal theory, personal opinion, stupidity (legal) | Tagged: appeals court judge, federal judge, Harvard Law School, law, law school graduate, law student, Lawyer, Magna Cum Laude, SCOTUS, SCOTUS nominee, Summa Cum Laude | Leave a Comment »